Judge rules on RCF case

Surprisingly, the Cardinal is the only paper to report this. 

From my understanding, the ruling states that the university used a reasonable, yet incorrect interpretation of the law when withholding funds from the Roman Catholic Foundation.  Since the interpretation was reasonable, the university does not need to repay withheld funds, but they cannot continue to withhold funds under the current set of laws and univerisity policies.  

However, the university could create a criterion for funding that would prohibit the use of segregated fees for expressed religious purposes, as long as this criterion is view-point neutral.  

Well, that isn’t confusing…



One Response to “Judge rules on RCF case”

  1. madgirl Says:

    The State Journal had this story in yesterday’s paper:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: